Roger Ebert often shared his Stanton-Walsh Rule, which stated that
any movie that featured Harry Dean Stanton or M. Emmett Walsh couldn't
be all bad. I'd like to amend that rule and make it my own by saying
that any movie with Stanley Tucci can't be all bad.
Yet Stanley Tucci doesn't have an Oscar. More shockingly, he only has one nomination. But since he still has at least a decade of work ahead of him, I hope this awards oversight will be rectified ... and soon.
I first discovered Tucci when he played Karl
Draconis, the advertising executive with a complicated relationship with
our handsome hero, Michael Stedman, on thirtysomething. Draconis
was always a little too rumpled and a
little too intense to be likeable. It was a memorable role not because
it was a "star turn," but because he disappeared so completely into
Tucci's TV work continues to be stellar. To
borrow a cliche, he's one of the hardest working men in show business
and appears on TV when the role feels right. He currently has two Emmys
on his mantle. It's Oscar that eludes him.
I suppose his most familiar movie role is Caesar Flickerman, host of The Hunger Games.
With his brightly-colored hair and creepy pseudo-friendliness, he cut
such an iconic figure that Stephen Colbert regularly imitates him on The Late Show.
Entertaining though Flickerman is, it's not the kind
of performance that is rewarded by the Academy. For this post, I'm going
to concentrate on the four performances that could easily have put an
Oscar in his hands.
|Flickerman meets Flickerman|
2006: The Devil Wears Prada. Nigel is a homosexual art director at a fashion
magazine, and in other hands, could have easily devolved into stereotype. Tucci's Nigel is more than the lovable, loyal gay sidekick to the movie's
two straight girls (Andrea and Miranda). He's alert. His eyes are
always sharp, his attention is always focused, his intelligence and
imagination are always engaged. His connection to Miranda may be
emotional, but hers to him is strictly transactional. He's made himself so good
at his job that he's useful to her. Early on we see him not just finishing
her sentences but elaborating on her thoughts.
Miranda: "Don't you think it's too
Nigel: "Last summer? I thought that, too! But with the
right accessories, it could work."
He clearly loves his work, and he's a good coworker. The way he takes Andrea under
his wing, sensing that he's the one who can help her before
she can even figure out who to ask, is genuinely sweet. So when
Miranda tosses him under the bus to save herself, we're appalled. Not because of what she did -- at this point in the movie, we know what Miranda is -- but because of who she did it to. By now,
we care about Nigel, we appreciate how much the works means
to him, and believe that the three-dimensional man Tucci created
deserved a better fate. (Prada trivia: Tucci kept up with his
costar, Emily Blunt, and was invited to her 2011 wedding. A recent
widower, he met and fell in love with the bride's sister, who has since
become his second wife.)
2009: The Lovely Bones. Tucci got his
only Oscar nod to date for a role that's truly hard to watch. George
Harvey is a child rapist and murderer. Part of what makes him horrifying
is how bland he appears. He lives alone. He has his quiet hobbies (tending
flowers, building dollhouses). He always smiles and says "hi." Even his sneezy idiosyncrasy -- he sniffles a lot --
is ordinary. In a brave performance, Tucci is unafraid to also show
George's strengths. This man is driven and smart. Like Nigel (and this
is perhaps the only trait George shares with dear Nigel),
George is deceptively alert. It's what makes him a successful predator.
For, while we and Susie's family know he what he did, he's never
prosecuted. At least not by the judicial system. In one of the movie's
best scenes, we see how George is living, years after killing Susie.
He's still at it. Still looking for young girls to victimize. While
stalking a girl, he is struck by an icicle and falls into a ravine, left
to die in icy isolation. I didn't like this movie -- the subject matter
is harrowing and the visuals are over-the-top and erratic -- but I
admired Tucci's risky performance. Interestingly, he lost the Oscar that
year to Christoph Waltz, who also played a monster in Inglorious Basterds.
2009: Julie and Julia. In this movie we see Tucci in love, and it's a sight to behold. He's paired with Streep again, this time playing Julia Child's
husband, cultural attaché Paul Child. As portrayed by Tucci, Paul is so self confident
that he can enthusiastically encourage and then revel in his wife’s pursuits. Considering that the "Julia" scenes take place in the 1940s
and 1950s, the Childs’ marriage of equals is a romantic miracle. We believe that he sees this formidable, 6’2 woman as
sensual and sensuous, as well as brilliant and capable. My favorite scene is his party toast: "You are the butter to my bread and the breath to my
life. I love you, darling girl. Happy Valentine’s Day.” You come away thinking Julia was a very lucky woman, indeed.
2015: Spotlight. This movie is filled with good performances. But still, I was surprised Tucci was overlooked by the Academy, because his is really the only character who evolves during the film. He's Mitchell Garabedian, the lawyer who represented so many victims of abusive priests in Boston. When we first meet him, he seems distracted, hostile and unwilling to help the warmer and fuzzier reporter, Mark Revendez (Mark Ruffalo, who did receive an Oscar nod). As the story unfolds, we realize that Garabedian isn't trying block the story, he's simply not interested in glory. As the only one seriously litigating what went on with the Boston archdiocese, he cared about his clients more than he cared about The Boston Globe. Contrast the prickly Garabedian with sunny and handsome Eric Macleish (Billy Crudup), another Boston barrister. Friendly, available Macleish loves reporters and makes time to talk. But by the end of the movie, we come to appreciate Garabedian, the the little guy who takes on Boston's entrenched and powerful, giving voice to victims who had gone unheard for so long. Watch Tucci in the courtroom and dealing with his victims and you'll see a grumpy, solitary lawyer transform into Don Quixote, right before your eyes.
Read more about the Academy Awards through the 31 Days of Oscar Blogathon! Here are the topics:
February 6 THE ACTORS!
February 13 OSCAR SNUBS!
February 20 THE CRAFTS! (Music, Costumes, Cinematography, Writing, etc.)
February 27 PICTURES AND DIRECTORS!
... And here are the hubs:
Once Upon a Screen
Outspoken and Freckled
Paula's Cinema Club
I adore Stanley Tucci!ReplyDelete
I can't wait to read your entries.
Great choice. Underrated but essential in all he does. I agree that in a very deserving cast, Tucci deserved the nomination the most for Spotlight (actually, I thought Ruffalo deserved it the least--not his best performance). Tucci is brilliant in Devil Wears Prada. One of my favorite roles is in Margin Call (where he's also a standout in a great cast).ReplyDelete
Great post, you hit all the highlights. I LOVE "the Tooch" and believe he is one of the few who could have excelled in studio-era Hollywood. He has a gift with those minor roles that could easily disappear, another of them is also one of my favorite roles of his: the Dad in EASY A.ReplyDelete