data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9e338/9e338b2b40d144aa9aab8afdc8b6e64418d2f7c6" alt=""
Meryl Streep rises above a pretty mediocre film. The narrative is all over the place. Some very dramatic personal moments -- such as a bomb attempt on her life or her husband giving her two strands of pearls to commemorate the birth of their twins -- are glossed over and don't have the emotional wallop they should have. I'm still not sure what the movie was trying to say.
But Meryl Streep humanizes a woman whose public persona was, for me, at least, lacking in humanity. She shows her as trailblazer who often got her feelings hurt, a mother who consciously made tough personal choices, a wife who loved her husband dearly. And her fragility now, as she fades into senility, is very touching.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/03957/03957ff1a644c952dda26409e99b54d1233f2888" alt=""
Critics seem to feel that it's not right to show this formidable conservative icon as she (apparently) is today. Well, get over it. She's a historic figure. Much as I revere JFK, I don't complain when he's shown with other women or (worse) with his brains flying through the air. It happened. Every life has an arc -- a beginning, a middle and an end. Every life has good and bad, exultant and embarrassing.
If this mess of a movie is historically accurate, Maggie's supporters should just get over it. And thank Meryl Streep for making her more likable than I thought possible.
I'm glad you wrote about this film. I was curious. It will never run in our local theater so I have to wait for the video.
ReplyDelete"....philosophy doesn't include those who don't have boots."
ReplyDeleteWell turned phrase.
Love it.
Thanks for the review.