In the heat of the 2016 campaign, I accidentally happened upon a Facebook poster who referred to herself as Julia Sugarbaker, the sassiest character on Designing Woman. It would be unfair to Bernie Sanders to refer to her as the typical Sanders supporter, but she was indicative of "the more progressive" wing of the Democratic Party.
OK, the nuts.
She railed against Hillary for being "an American oligarch," for killing people, for the "neurological disorder" that caused her to "short circuit" during interviews.
She hated on Debbie Wasserman Schultz and Donna Brazile for the unfair way the DNC hated on Bernie. She ignored, of course, that she was getting all of her information from Wikileaks and never stopped to wonder why the Sanders campaign wasn't hacked. (Or the equivalency the Sanders' team emails would likely have revealed, since Presidential campaigns are a rough-and-tumble business.) She ignored how bad it was to take off on Brazile, since Bernie had an issue with women in general and women of color, specifically.
Now, of course, she has to deal with knowing that everything she believed, she was fed by Russia. She was manipulated by an enemy greater than Hillary Rodham Clinton.
She used social media to advance Putin's aims. To borrow from the 2016 debates:
via GIPHY
How is the lady herself dealing with all this? I mean, if it was me, and I realized how thoroughly I'd been played, I'd feel terrible. I like to think I'd become introspective, and look at how my passion turned to animus and blinded me to what was happening.
But then, I'm not "Julia." She's coping by ignoring. By moving on. By disseminating more misinformation. She gave an "A-fucking-men" to a post discrediting the intel agencies with this: "Because these same intelligence agencies were proven to have attempted
to silence Martin Luther King Jr. through coercive force and legal force
in an attempt to get him to commit suicide until his eventual
assassination."
Um, that's simply false. There was total antipathy between King and the too-powerful J. Edgar Hoover and MLK was the victim of illegal, immoral and unwise wire taps. But "coercive and legal force" designed to "attempt to get him to commit suicide until his eventual assassination?"
Nyet, comrade, nyet.
But keep saying it. Keep posting it, girlfriend. Keep sowing seeds of racial division as you dance at the end of those merry marionette strings. Let your hate and your conspiracy fever blind you to what you're actually doing.
PS Here's the perfect evidence of how totally "Julia Sugarbaker" ignores context. The character she has chosen as her "spirit animal" -- the original Julia Sugarbaker from the CBS TV show -- is the creation of Linda Bloodworth-Thomason. Linda and her husband, Harry, did the TV spots for Bill Clinton's 1982 gubernatorial campaign and have been close friends of Bill 'n' Hill ever since. They were involved in every Clinton campaign (his and hers, both) and were advisors in the Clinton White House.
You can't expect her to notice a relationship that's lasted 35 years and played out in public. Because it's true and transparent. Obvious. She foolishly prefers to concentrate on swampy conspiracies.
Remind me to wait another two years before I check her feed again!
I was thinking about Designing Women the other day, wondering how it would hold up if I saw reruns.
ReplyDeletePolitics certainly do bring out the "nuts" on every "side." I sort of blame the media (for tending to focus on the ridiculous and negative) and social media (for giving ever Tom, Dick, and Harry a platform to spout their opinion from). And very few, be they professional or amateur, seem to spend much time checking facts. Sigh.
ReplyDeleteOn to other things...I'm currently reading "Altar of Bones" by Philip Carter. I'm in the middle of it and it's just been revealed that this "altar of bones" everyone is looking for is connected to JFK's death and a second shooter on the grassy knoll. Marilyn Monroe makes an appearance. I can't wait to find out how this tale is going to play out. Just thought you might be interested.